Arts, Community Development

Putting Justice Back at the Centre of the Legal System: the Case of Kesha and Dr. Luke

5.00 avg. rating (99% score) - 1 vote

On Friday 19 February 2016, a judge in New York ruled that Kesha could not cancel her six album contract with Sony. From what I understand, Kesha wants to break all ties with Sony, where she would continue to have some form of contact with Dr. Luke, the producer she said drugged her, raped her, and emotionally abused her to keep her pliable. This is why she hasn’t accepted Sony’s option to work with another producer—she wants out of an environment in which she doesn’t feel safe.

Lena Dunham explained this situation with a very relatable metaphor: “Imagine someone really hurt you, physically and emotionally. Scared you and abused you, threatened your family. The judge says that you don’t have to see them again, BUT they still own your house. So they can decide when to turn the heat on and off, whether they’ll pay the telephone bill or fix the roof when it leaks. After everything you’ve been through, do you feel safe living in that house? Do you trust them to protect you?”

There are a lot of posts online related to this case about its legal ramifications, about the implications for future contract negotiations, about how to deal with false accusations, etc. But I have yet to find an article about the most important aspect of this entire situation: justice. So here is my attempt to put that vital concept back at the heart of the conversation.

Justice at a Personal Level

What is the truth of what happened between Kesha and Dr. Luke? How can we determine said truth, when there is no proof other than words? There might be no way of being able to do so, which means we might be stuck in a she-said, he-said situation, a seemingly unsolvable dilemma.

But what if we took a step back?

Contextual Justice In This Situation

Taking a step back reminds us that nothing happens in a vacuum. Whatever happens between two people happens within a larger context. The context within which this situation between Kesha and Dr. Luke is happening includes the following:

  1. The legal system requires physical proof that a crime was committed, and there is a lack of physical proof that Kesha was drugged, raped, and emotionally abused.
  2. There have been cases of women falsely accusing men of rape, in which case the falsely accused man’s life was ruined.
  3. The media loves a good drama between two individuals, such as accusation of abuse in the entertainment business (hello, Chris Brown and Rihanna.)
  4. It is the responsibility of the community and of the institutions governing it to protect vulnerable individuals.

How are These Concerns being Currently Addressed?

So maybe we can never find out what really happened between Kesha and Dr. Luke. But taking a step back to embrace the context of the situation helps us see that there are other things that can be done in the name of justice and how, by the same token, there are things we are currently doing that are unjust.

  1. There might not be any physical proof anymore, but has there been any form of investigation? I have not yet seen any sign of an investigation into the allegations. So Kesha’s statement seems to remain ignored for lack of physical proof.
  2. It seems that we are leaning towards protecting Dr. Luke in case Kesha is lying. The way media reports are formulated seem to imply that Kesha is questionable while Dr. Luke is not.
  3. There isn’t much about the case being covered in the media other than the focus on the contract between Sony and Kesha where, again, Kesha is being painted as acting solely for personal financial gain.
  4. Contractually, Kesha has to work relatively near Dr. Luke. So we are letting a potentially vulnerable person remain close to the potentially aggressive person.

What Does the Way we are Currently Addressing these Concerns Say/Imply About Us?

This is not looking good, guys. Even if we don’t know what happened, there are things in the list below that I find difficult to accept that we are, as a society, letting happen.

  1. An allegation of rape is only valid if there is physical proof. There is no physical proof, and so either there is no investigation, or no one is paying attention to whatever investigation might be going on.
  2. We are OK with Kesha being in danger even if it turns out that she is telling the truth, because we don’t want Dr. Luke to be falsely accused. This is reinforced by the fact that we seem OK with protecting Dr. Luke even if it means that Kesha might be falsely accused of lying (i.e. she is telling the truth).
  3. Other than the fight over the contract, nothing much about this case is deemed worthy to be covered by the media.
  4. We are willing to put a vulnerable person at risk.

What Are We Ignoring?

The list above seems to have been made ignoring a slew of information such as:

  1. How often is there physical proof in cases of rape? And how often, even with physical proof, is a woman’s accusation ignored?
  2. As visualised in a very informative infographic posted by Demi Lovato (featured at the end of this post), not many rape allegations end up being false.
  3. Our focus is about financial justice only, at the cost of human justice.
  4. What if Kesha is telling the truth? What if Dr. Luke is lying?

The Big Question of the Moment

It seems to me that we are focused on a very small portion of the issue, and, because of various biases (women lie about being raped; money is the most important thing) we end up, as a species, doing something that no other species on this planet does.

You see, animals usually protect their young ones for the sake of the perpetuation of their species. Kesha is young and has contributed a lot to pop culture already; she is now contributing to the all-important conversation about gender. And yet, we are not moving in to protect her.

I’m not implying that I’m 100% certain she is telling the truth. I am in no position to comment on that. But fact is that there is at least a 50% chance that she is a potential victim. And yet, what is written about this situation and the actions that have been taken seem to imply that she is 99% guilty.

This begs the question: why we are not protecting a potential victim? Do we have to be 100% sure that she has been raped to protect her?

Justice implies that we have to assume someone is innocent until proven guilty. We are so concerned that Dr. Luke will be falsely accused that we have created a non-existent dichotomy: protecting Kesha means accepting that Dr. Luke is guilty. And yet, we are OK with not protecting Kesha, which means that we are accepting that she is guilty of lying.

What happened to innocent until proven guilty when it comes to Kesha’s potential lie, then?

And… What if she’s telling the truth?

If a child claims to be in danger, protective services immediately react, despite the fact that a child is not considered mature enough to make life decisions and that there have been a number of false claims. But just in case this child, a vulnerable member of society, is in actual danger, we immediately react.

If Kesha is telling the truth… If she was drugged and raped and emotionally abused for ten years… If she developed an eating disorder because of this situation… If this situation caused her to get to such a bad place she needed rehab… Knowing that women are objectified constantly all around us… Knowing the rate of rape in general and in the entertainment business… Knowing that the number of false accusations is minute compared to the number of true accusations that are dismissed…

Can we afford, as a society, to dismiss out of hand what Kesha is claiming happened?

That we are focusing on preserving the sanctity of a contract “typical of the industry” over the break of the sanctity of a trusting relationship between a producer and an artist, rather than rethinking of what is “typical of the industry” … What does this say about us?

What does it say when no one is trying to determine the truth, or that, at the very least, we do not seem concerned with it?

What does it say that we are not willing to accept that there is a 50% chance that Kesha is being truthful and come up with a way for her to continue working?

It says that we have a big, big, BIG mess to clean up.

And let’s say it turns out Kesha is lying. I would be so proud of my human family if it had taken the approach to protect her even more because someone who lies about this has vulnerabilities as well.

We do not need to protect Kesha at Dr. Luke’s expense, but we do not need to protect Dr. Luke at Kesha’s expense.

They are both innocent until proven guilty in both cases.  Dr. Luke is innocent of raping Kesha until proven guilty; Kesha is innocent of lying until proven guilty. We have to break away from a two dimensional view of a complex situation and figure out another way of approaching it.

Let’s say it comes out that Kesha lied…

But what if she didn’t?

There are a lot more good men that bad ones, so man bashing won’t help and needs to stop.

There are more women telling the truth than lying about being raped, so woman bashing isn’t helping either and needs to stop.

We have to stop being children obsessed with pointing fingers and issuing one dimensional sentences; we need to become adults capable of complex thinking and reasoning.


Sahar's Blog 2016 03 15 Putting Justice Back at the Centre of the Legal System the Case of Kesha and Dr. LukeAs posted on Demi Lovato’s Instagram account: “As most people know, I tend to get fired up about the things I believe in, and although my heart and intentions are always in the right place, unfortunately sometimes my passion gets the best of me and causes me to say things that I probably shouldn’t say. And when doing so it takes away from the real reason I am speaking up in the first place. Our focus should be on the topic of victims of sexual and physical abuse being afraid to come forward with their stories. They’re more likely to face retaliation and harassment than to see justice being served. Especially women. It baffles me that when it comes to serious issues like equality and abuse, too often women are not taken as seriously as men. All I want to see is women coming together and actually making a difference. A real change and shift in society. Everyone has their own way of giving support to others , and at the end of the day, helping victims is all that matters. Ultimately, the message I want people to hear is it’s okay to come forward with your abuse and if you do decide to take action, you are not alone.”

First published on Sahar’s Blog on 15 March 2016

5.00 avg. rating (99% score) - 1 vote

4 thoughts on “Putting Justice Back at the Centre of the Legal System: the Case of Kesha and Dr. Luke

  1. There is always a seperation of criminal and civil law suits and it usually depends on the application before the court. From what I am reading in your post, this might be the issue here and therefore no mention is made of the alledged rape charge. I agree with you, injustice should never happen to anyone but there is a reason they call it – the long arm of justice, one day the culprit will suffer!

    1. That’s a very interesting comment, Amanda, thank you! So if I understand correctly, right not thee is only a civil law suit happening focused on the contract, right?

      1. Amanda is correct. There is only a civil case before the Court at the moment.

        It’s interesting to read that all you’ve heard is mostly negative and skeptical reports towards Kesha. I’ve heard just the opposite. I’ve read countless articles expressing outrage against the ruling and Kesha’s plight.

        The February ruling was not the end all be all in her civil case either. The judge ruled that based on the evidence provided at that time (mostly he said/she said) he could not grant the injunction. She does have further opportunities to collect more evidence. With that said, the judge can’t flaunt the law and I don’t think his ruling is a commentary on whether Kesha is or isn’t lying. A ruling without proper evidence will set a precedent that will have a huge effect on contractual case law. It is an unfortunate situation but this is how our judicial system is designed, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff’s shoulders.

        I think Sony could make the majority of this nightmare go away if they would simply buy out Kesha’s contract from Dr. Luke’s production company. Sony reps have talked time and again how they want to support Kesha and help her stage a comeback but they don’t control her contract, Dr. Luke’s company does. To that I say, Sony put your money where your mouth is.

        1. Thank you for commenting, Jennifer! I did give the impression that I have only read the negative stuff, haven’t I! You’re right, there is also a lot of support going on at the same time, which is important and should be acknowledged. I think you also raise a very interesting point about how Sony could choose to step in and buy out Kesha’s contract from Dr. Luke’s production company, especially in light of what the company has said. Why do you think they haven’t chosen to do so yet?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *