Here is another reason why celebrities shouldn’t be role models: they are often the result of careful marketing strategies. What we think as coming from celebrities, i.e. what some people consider as the standards towards which they strive, are actually coming from a team of people manipulating that stars image. And, however obvious this argument might seem, it’s interesting to note that it isn’t really taken into consideration nowadays.
When stars Twitter, a ghost may be lurking
By Noah Cohem; posted on IHT.com on March 27th 2009
The rapper 50 Cent is among the legion of stars who have recently embraced Twitter to reach fans who crave near-continuous access to their lives and thoughts. On March 1, he shared this insight with the more than 200,000 people who follow him: “My ambition leads me through a tunnel that never ends.”
Those were 50 Cent’s words, but it was not exactly him tweeting. Rather, it was Chris Romero, known as Broadway, the director of the rapper’s Web empire, who typed in those words after reading them in an interview.
“He doesn’t actually use Twitter,” Mr. Romero said of 50 Cent, whose real name is Curtis Jackson III, “but the energy of it is all him.”
In its short history, Twitter — a microblogging tool that uses 140 characters in bursts of text — has become an important marketing tool for celebrities, politicians and businesses, promising a level of intimacy never before approached online, as well as giving the public the ability to speak directly to people and institutions once comfortably on a pedestal.
But someone has to do all that writing, even if each entry is barely a sentence long. In many cases, celebrities and their handlers have turned to outside writers — ghost Twitterers, if you will — who keep fans updated on the latest twists and turns, often in the star’s own voice.
Because Twitter is seen as an intimate link between celebrities and their fans, many performers are not willing to divulge the help they use to put their thoughts into cyberspace.
Read the rest of this post here.
4 thoughts on “IHT: ‘When stars Twitter, a ghost may be lurking’”
[…] Original post by sahar009 […]
I first saw this article in the New York Times and was so disappointed by its subject matter–the headline seemed so promising. I thought it was going to be about a celestial phenomenon….it wasn’t. So I helpfully rewrote it: http://jennamcwilliams.blogspot.com/2009/03/nytimes-headline-when-stars-twitter.html.
Thank you for your comment, Jenna, and thank you for the link. It’s a great rewrite that you did! I would definitely recommend it. Thank you for reading my blog!
I’m new to this blog. Apologize for asking this though, but to OP… Thanks 🙂